Skip to main content

Why are there so many /dev/tty in Linux?


In ubuntu 10.04, if I check under /dev, there are more than 50 ttys. tty0, tty1, tty2....


I understand tty is a character device for console input/output.




  1. but why is there so many of them? is it something like pool?




  2. and what is the difference between /dev/pts/0, 1, 2... , /dev/tty?




  3. If I open up a terminal, new number is created under /dev/pts. but I don't know when /dev/tty? is used.


    even if I create a SSH connection, number of /dev/tty s are same.


    and if I do


    cat /dev/tty0

    and type something in keyboard, I get corresponding outputs. why is this happening?





Answer



The ttys are not just input/output devices. They also do a special job of acting as the controlling terminal for a session, like sending signals (Ctrl+C). /dev/ttyNN are virtual consoles, which are full screen displays on the monitor.


The terminals start from /dev/tty1. You could switch to these consoles, usually, by pressing Ctrl+Alt+Fn keys.


e.g, Ctrl+Alt+F1 takes you to the first virtual terminal. Nowadays, most of the Linux distributions run the X server from the tty1. So, pressing Ctrl+Alt+F1 may not have an effect.


$ ps ax | grep Xorg | grep -v grep
1504 tty1 Ss+ 44:57 /usr/bin/Xorg :0 -background none -verbose -auth /var/run/gdm/auth-for-gdm-rfsWyA/database -nolisten tcp vt1

Ctrl+Alt+F2 will take you to the second terminal. Usually the distributions run a login program(agetty) on the virtual terminal.


$ ps ax | grep tty2 | grep -v grep
31865 tty2 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/agetty tty2 38400

The login programs provide you a login prompt and lets you login with username/password. The init scripts decides, where all the login program will be run. So depending on that you may or may not see a login prompt on, say tty9. To go back to your GUI interface, press Ctrl+Alt+F1(as in example output above).


/dev/tty0 is a special device, which points to the current terminal. So, irrespective of where you run it from(any virtual console), anything read from/written to tty0 goes to your current terminal.


The second column in 'ps ax' also gives the controlling terminal of the program. For some programs, like daemons, you may see that the column is '?', which means they are not bound to a terminal.


/dev/pts/0 etc are psuedo-terminal devices, which are not attached to the system display. for e.g, terminal you get when you open a gnome-terminal or any other GUI terminal. These are client-server based approach where client side will be exported to programs, like bash. The data send by the program to the pseudo terminal is sent to the 'server' side (which is usually monitored by another program, like gnome-terminal). The controlling process (server side) determines what needs to be sent to the terminal, which is eventually seen by the client. These devices help you to open multiple 'GUI terminals' without any limit on your system, still providing the same old terminal like controls(ioctl(), colour setting, Sending signals [Ctrl+C] etc. ).


Comments

Popular Posts

How do I transmit a single hexadecimal value serial data in PuTTY using an Alt code?

I am trying to sent a specific hexadecimal value across a serial COM port using PuTTY. Specifically, I want to send the hex codes 9C, B6, FC, and 8B. I have looked up the Alt codes for these and they are 156, 182, 252, and 139 respectively. However, whenever I input the Alt codes, a preceding hex value of C2 is sent before 9C, B6, and 8B so the values that are sent are C2 9C, C2 B6, and C2 8B. The value for FC is changed to C3 FC. Why are these values being placed before the hex value and why is FC being changed altogether? To me, it seems like there is a problem internally converting the Alt code to hex. Is there a way to directly input hex values without using Alt codes in PuTTY? Answer What you're seeing is just ordinary text character set conversion. As far as PuTTY is concerned, you are typing (and reading) text , not raw binary data, therefore it has to convert the text to bytes in whatever configured character set before sending it over the wire. In other words, when y...

linux - Extract/save a mail attachment using bash

Using normal bash tools (ie, built-ins or commonly-available command-line tools), is it possible, and how to extract/save attachments on emails? For example, say I have a nightly report which arrives via email but is a zip archive of several log files. I want to save all those zips into a backup directory. How would I accomplish that? Answer If you're aiming for portability, beware that there are several different versions of mail(1) and mailx(1) . There's a POSIX mailx command, but with very few requirements. And none of the implementations I have seem to parse attachments anyway. You might have the mpack package . Its munpack command saves all parts of a MIME message into separate files, then all you have to do is save the interesting parts and clean up the rest. There's also metamail . An equivalent of munpack is metamail -wy .

ubuntu - Why does my USB hdd returns SG_IO: bad/missing sense data?

I am able to boot and run commands from external USB hdd; the message in question appears for about 45 seconds then booting continues. GRUB2 is installed on internal HDD. When choosing to boot directly to /dev/sdb the message doesn't appear, however boot time is about the same as booting to internal HDD. /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 1018 MB in 2.00 seconds = 508.97 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 80 MB in 3.03 seconds = 26.37 MB/sec pfeiffep@de:~$ sudo hdparm -i /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: SG_IO: bad/missing sense data, sb[]: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Invalid argument Gparted correctly identifies the drive as SAMSUNG MP0402H. Any ideas how to remedy the HDIO & SG_IO messages?

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...