Skip to main content

networking - Will multiple switches slow transfer speed


I want to create link between a data server (It's more like NAS) and around 300 computers.


Data transferred per day is around 2GB/computer and speed really matters.


If I use a single switch it would 300 Ethernet cables and may be too messy to maintain.


If I use a switch on every 50 computers would it slow down the connection speed?



Answer



If with 'transfer speed' you mean throughput: It should not matter much.


Every extra device will introduce some minor latency (after all some processing is needed, if if it is only very minor). However latency is not the same as throughput.


Compare it with a conversation via a satellite phone. There will be a 3 second lag before someone else can comment on what you said, but if one person just keep talking, telling long (2GB) stories then the slow down will be minimal.


Which means that I would test these setups:



     +-48 port switch ------ 40 computers
B    |
a    +-48 port switch ------ 40 computers
c    |
k    +-48 port switch ------ 40 computers
p    |
l    +-48 port switch ------ 40 computers
a    |
n    ...
e    |
     +-48 port switch ------ 40 computers

Many switches have a connection which allows you to turn several separate units units into one giant switch. That makes management much easier. Much sure that the switches you buy have this feature.


Why 48 ports switches?
It limit the number of devices. (less space, less devices which can break down).


Why 40 computers per 48 port switch?
Future expandability (Computers moving to different rooms increasing local density, added devices such as printers, a free port for debugging etc. etc.


Why not a single 300 port switch?
Good luck finding those...


[Edit] Apparently there are some. I looked up the model mentioned by David, it is about 25K US$... Use these kinds of switches if you absolutely need maximum performance.


If you already have switches without an backplane link you could always to something like this, but that would mean traffic would flow excessively to whatever switch hosts your file-server. That might overload that switch and with will introduce much more latency than needed.




                 1 fileserver
40 computers     39 computers     ...  40 computers
   | | |               | | |              | | |
48 port switch   48 port switch   ...  48 port switch
    |        |     |         |             |       | 
    |        +-----+         +--        ---+       |   Disabled by 
    |                                              |   default
    +----------------------------------------------+


(The long roundabout cable is in case a switch dies. That would cut off all computers on it and to the side from the switch with the fileserver. In which case switches with spanning tree protocol can detect this and automatically enable the workaround link.)


Lastly, there is always the classical tiered setup:



        Fileserver and other servers
                     |
                 CORE SWITCH
                /   |        \
               /    |         \
 48 port switch   switch  ...  48 port switch
      | | |       | | |                | | |
  40 computers    computers   ...  40 computers

This one has the advantage that you have one (very good) switch in the server room, and at least one link from that switch to each floor or each section.


Then you set up a local room with all the switches for that floor. (If needed with multiple switched, tied via a backlink).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

How do I transmit a single hexadecimal value serial data in PuTTY using an Alt code?

I am trying to sent a specific hexadecimal value across a serial COM port using PuTTY. Specifically, I want to send the hex codes 9C, B6, FC, and 8B. I have looked up the Alt codes for these and they are 156, 182, 252, and 139 respectively. However, whenever I input the Alt codes, a preceding hex value of C2 is sent before 9C, B6, and 8B so the values that are sent are C2 9C, C2 B6, and C2 8B. The value for FC is changed to C3 FC. Why are these values being placed before the hex value and why is FC being changed altogether? To me, it seems like there is a problem internally converting the Alt code to hex. Is there a way to directly input hex values without using Alt codes in PuTTY? Answer What you're seeing is just ordinary text character set conversion. As far as PuTTY is concerned, you are typing (and reading) text , not raw binary data, therefore it has to convert the text to bytes in whatever configured character set before sending it over the wire. In other words, when y...
Post a Comment
Read more

linux - Extract/save a mail attachment using bash

Using normal bash tools (ie, built-ins or commonly-available command-line tools), is it possible, and how to extract/save attachments on emails? For example, say I have a nightly report which arrives via email but is a zip archive of several log files. I want to save all those zips into a backup directory. How would I accomplish that? Answer If you're aiming for portability, beware that there are several different versions of mail(1) and mailx(1) . There's a POSIX mailx command, but with very few requirements. And none of the implementations I have seem to parse attachments anyway. You might have the mpack package . Its munpack command saves all parts of a MIME message into separate files, then all you have to do is save the interesting parts and clean up the rest. There's also metamail . An equivalent of munpack is metamail -wy .
Post a Comment
Read more

ubuntu - Why does my USB hdd returns SG_IO: bad/missing sense data?

I am able to boot and run commands from external USB hdd; the message in question appears for about 45 seconds then booting continues. GRUB2 is installed on internal HDD. When choosing to boot directly to /dev/sdb the message doesn't appear, however boot time is about the same as booting to internal HDD. /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 1018 MB in 2.00 seconds = 508.97 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 80 MB in 3.03 seconds = 26.37 MB/sec pfeiffep@de:~$ sudo hdparm -i /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: SG_IO: bad/missing sense data, sb[]: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Invalid argument Gparted correctly identifies the drive as SAMSUNG MP0402H. Any ideas how to remedy the HDIO & SG_IO messages?
Post a Comment
Read more

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...
Post a Comment
Read more