Skip to main content

Extracting (or copying) files to a compressed NTFS folder makes Windows report the disk is full when it's not


I've been trying to extract a series of compressed files - total ~50GiB (uncompressed) - to a hard disk with about 55GiB of free space.


Because this is a slow hard drive and with limited capacity, and since the content is highly compressible, I thought it would be a good idea to extract it to a new folder with NTFS compression enabled.


Now, as the extraction progresses, if I right-click the folder at any given moment to see its properties, it'll report the correct disk usage (e.g. "size 4.5GiB; size on disk 2.65GiB"). But, if I right-click the drive, the properties window will report a much larger increase reported as "used space" - in fact, a little over than the sum of "size" and "size on disk".


And this goes up to the point where the extraction fails because Windows reports the disk is full.


After some research I found a comment in the microsoft forums:



This problem has to do with a known Windows 10 bug. When you copy a file to a NTFS folder that has compression enabled, the drive will use twice the space required and won't relinquish that until a reboot of the drive.



This looks bizarre enough because it appears to defeat much of the purpose of transparent compression IMO. But okay, at the end of the day what I want to know is if there's a way around this.


I tried suspending in the middle of extraction with Process Hacker, taking the disk "Offline" and then back "Online" via the Disk Manager (diskmgmt.msc) and resuming the process. The "Used space" number is then reported correctly, but the extraction fails.


Is there an actual solution?



Answer



The steps I used to work around the problem were:



  1. Disable NTFS compression on the target folder

  2. Begin extraction

  3. Monitor disk space usage and Suspend (freeze) the working process that is performing the decompression when the disk space is near full

  4. Select all decompressed files, except the last one; right-click them and enable NTFS compression

  5. Wait until they are NTFS-compressed

  6. Resume execution of the suspended process

  7. Keep doing steps 3 - 6 until all files have been extracted

  8. Finally, re-enable NTFS compression on the target folder.


And this is how I managed to install Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

keyboard - Is there any utility/method to change Windows key bindings to type rare chars to currently empty bindings?

I'm currently typing this post with my windows XP machine and (Spanish) keyboard, and I'd like to add some extra symbols to my text. I could open the "char map" windows utility, look for the desired symbols, and paste them. But I'd like something quickier. For example, when I'm using my OSX Mac at work, I can easily add a ©, ™, ® or similar symbols, just pressing some weird ALT-GR + G / H / J, key combinations. In my (Spanish) keyboard mapping, these combinations are empty, as they don't produce any char at all, which, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and desirable. So, I thought: Why couldn't I add some extra key mappings on top of my currently empty ALT-GR + G/J/H Keys in my Spanish keyboard, and thus, being able to quickly type these special symbols? So that's my question: Is there any utility/method to achieve that effect under windows? (My version is XP). I've even googled this for some time but no luck. I've been a long term Hot...
Post a Comment
Read more

virtualization - How to select paravirtualization interface in VirtualBox?

Given a windows 8 host system (Intel Core i5) and a Linux Fedora host, I would like to determine the optimal setting for the paravirtual interface. Options are none Default Legacy minimal Hyper-V KVM This page suggest the selection is only based on the guest system: The biggest change in VirtualBox 5.0 is the introduction of paravirtualization support, bringing higher performance and time-keeping accuracy to supported guest operating systems (Hyper-V on Windows and KVM on Linux). Is that correct? Answer The VirtualBox Manual , in the section titled Paravirtualization providers explains very clearly when each should be used (emphasis added): Minimal: Announces the presence of a virtualized environment. Additionally, reports the TSC and APIC frequency to the guest operating system. This provider is mandatory for running any Mac OS X guests. KVM: Presents a Linux KVM hypervisor interface which is recognized by Linux kernels starting with version 2.6.25. VirtualBox's implementati...
Post a Comment
Read more

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...
Post a Comment
Read more

security - How is Linux not prone to viruses, malware and those kinds of things?

How is Linux protected against viruses? This question was a Super User Question of the Week . Read the blog entry for more details or contribute to the blog yourself Answer Well, it factually is not... it's just less subject to hackers developing viruses that target Linux systems. Consumer grade computers usually run on Windows and thus, when targeting a wide audience, Windows is the way to go. Don't misunderstand Linux and viruses, there definitely ARE Linux viruses. Some distros have additional protection layers such as SELinux (See here ) in Ubuntu for example. Then there's the default firewall and the fact that alien files don't automatically have permission to be executed. Specific execution permission has to be granted before execution is possible. (See here ) Then there are several other factors that make Linux a hard place to be for viruses usually non-root users on linux systems have no to little executable files at their disposal that would allow for virus...
Post a Comment
Read more