Skip to main content

troubleshooting - Computer doesn't start when graphics card plugged in


Symptoms: after changing heatsink on graphics card, computer won't turn on when graphics card is plugged in PCIE slot. When I press the power button, fans move a little bit and that's it.


The card is XFX Radeon 6850. With the card not plugged into motherboard, but plugged into power, computer boots. With the card in motherboard, with or without power, it doesn't.


The heatsink was Arctic Cooling Accelero S1Rev2. It was a tight fit, and I had trimmed some of the heat spreaders to get them to fit. When testing with Furmark one of the temperatures was much higher than others, so I decided to reapply thermal paste. After doing that was the last time the system successfully POSTed, it went like this: BIOS screen came up, GRUB came up, Windows started loading, and then the screen went black, all fans stopped, and the power LED started flashing. It continued flashing even after I disconnected power cord from PSU, and stopped at the moment I disconnected monitor.


I took the heatsink off the card again to check for obvious shorts, put it back together, still the same.


I understand that the card may very well be dead now--maybe thermal paste spilled somewhere, maybe static electricity hit at some point, maybe heatsink touched something it shouldn't have, or maybe just not delicate enough handling. Anyhow, given the symptoms, what would be your guess what's gone wrong?



Answer



This sounds like the GPU on your card is fried. This is very similar to how CPUs fry when you don't fit the heatsink properly. You will turn on the PC, it will maybe get as far as booting into Windows if you're lucky, then it dies as the CPU overheats.


The same thing will happen with a graphics card GPU, so unless you are 100% sure the heatsink was seated on the GPU, it has probably overheated and fried.


By the way: Maybe thermal paste spilled somewhere. This wouldn't do anything as it isn't conductive – well unless it is silver compound – and even then it is only slightly conductive so wouldn't make any difference. The worst it would do is slow things down slightly or cause artefacts.


Maybe static electricity hits at some point – static is a possiblity when you had the card out of the system. If it struck the memory on the card this wouldnt do it much good.


Maybe the heatsink touched something it shouldn't have. This is the most likely thing that happened. If you have ever fried an old harddrive on purpose when you were younger, if you cross any of the circuits on the drive it doesn't tend to die straight away, it usually takes a few seconds before things heat up enough for it to cooks an onboard chip and dies.


Or maybe just not delicate enough handling (possibility again, but I think the above is more likely).


Comments

Popular Posts

keyboard - Is there any utility/method to change Windows key bindings to type rare chars to currently empty bindings?

I'm currently typing this post with my windows XP machine and (Spanish) keyboard, and I'd like to add some extra symbols to my text. I could open the "char map" windows utility, look for the desired symbols, and paste them. But I'd like something quickier. For example, when I'm using my OSX Mac at work, I can easily add a ©, ™, ® or similar symbols, just pressing some weird ALT-GR + G / H / J, key combinations. In my (Spanish) keyboard mapping, these combinations are empty, as they don't produce any char at all, which, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and desirable. So, I thought: Why couldn't I add some extra key mappings on top of my currently empty ALT-GR + G/J/H Keys in my Spanish keyboard, and thus, being able to quickly type these special symbols? So that's my question: Is there any utility/method to achieve that effect under windows? (My version is XP). I've even googled this for some time but no luck. I've been a long term Hot...

virtualization - How to select paravirtualization interface in VirtualBox?

Given a windows 8 host system (Intel Core i5) and a Linux Fedora host, I would like to determine the optimal setting for the paravirtual interface. Options are none Default Legacy minimal Hyper-V KVM This page suggest the selection is only based on the guest system: The biggest change in VirtualBox 5.0 is the introduction of paravirtualization support, bringing higher performance and time-keeping accuracy to supported guest operating systems (Hyper-V on Windows and KVM on Linux). Is that correct? Answer The VirtualBox Manual , in the section titled Paravirtualization providers explains very clearly when each should be used (emphasis added): Minimal: Announces the presence of a virtualized environment. Additionally, reports the TSC and APIC frequency to the guest operating system. This provider is mandatory for running any Mac OS X guests. KVM: Presents a Linux KVM hypervisor interface which is recognized by Linux kernels starting with version 2.6.25. VirtualBox's implementati...

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...

security - How is Linux not prone to viruses, malware and those kinds of things?

How is Linux protected against viruses? This question was a Super User Question of the Week . Read the blog entry for more details or contribute to the blog yourself Answer Well, it factually is not... it's just less subject to hackers developing viruses that target Linux systems. Consumer grade computers usually run on Windows and thus, when targeting a wide audience, Windows is the way to go. Don't misunderstand Linux and viruses, there definitely ARE Linux viruses. Some distros have additional protection layers such as SELinux (See here ) in Ubuntu for example. Then there's the default firewall and the fact that alien files don't automatically have permission to be executed. Specific execution permission has to be granted before execution is possible. (See here ) Then there are several other factors that make Linux a hard place to be for viruses usually non-root users on linux systems have no to little executable files at their disposal that would allow for virus...