Skip to main content

crash - Graphics Corruption even during Boot, then after 2 failed reboots it says BOOTMGR is missing


I'm encountering a very frustrating and confusing problem with my desktop and I am really hoping someone has experienced either a similar problem or knows what I can do to fix this.


To start off, here are my system specs:



  • CPU: AMD FX8120

  • RAM: Ripjaw 2x 8GB DDR3 1333Mhz

  • HDD: 1 Samsung 1TB, 1 WD 160GB and 1 Seagates 2TB

  • GPU: Asus 7950 Direct CU II (the one with the massive heatsink)

  • Mobo: AMD Sabertooth 990FX

  • PSU: Coolermaster Silent Pro 700W (Modular)

  • OS: Windows 7 Latest Version

  • Graphics Drivers: Latest Stable Version on AMD


I've been using it for roughly 2-3 years without any major issues (though Windows 7 has a few minor driver issues with the network adapter from time to time, but that's about it).


Now one night, I was playing a game on my desktop and suddenly there was major graphic corruption (lots of weird horizontal bars that garbled the screen) until an eventual system crash.


When it started up, even from the bios there was more graphical corruption (2 vertical bars) and the usual startup repair (was not able to do anything). I restarted and checked the BIOS (it's using UEFI), and all the vitals and thermals seemed within safe ranges (51C for CPU and 33C for the mobo). I switched to AMD optimized defaults in case it might do something and restarted.


It loaded into the login screen with more graphic corruption (attaching a photo). When I tried to login, it suddenly turned white with graphic corruption (with more vertical and horizontal bars). After the next reboot, it now says that the BOOTMGR is missing, but it is in this kind of garbled text where the 'l's are replaced with something like ||.


I don't really know what's wrong or the extent of the damage, but I'm really hoping someone here has an idea. It is really killing me inside because I built the whole thing myself and now it's dying on me.


Massive thanks in advance to anyone who can help!


Here is the photo I took of the login screen with graphic corruption, it actually got worse later on though



Answer



The BOOTMGR is missing message has nothing to do with your current problem. The restarts made your operating system damaged and it is no longer able to boot. It is easy to fix this, just follow these steps:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2622803


According to your picture this can be caused by multiple problems, firs of all I would verify the cable between the monitor and the PC if it is plugged in correctly, next if your motherboard has an integrated GPU, you should give it a try by connecting your monitor to it, or connecting your monitor to another device.
This way you can find out if it is a problem with your monitor or your GPU.


Comments

Popular Posts

keyboard - Is there any utility/method to change Windows key bindings to type rare chars to currently empty bindings?

I'm currently typing this post with my windows XP machine and (Spanish) keyboard, and I'd like to add some extra symbols to my text. I could open the "char map" windows utility, look for the desired symbols, and paste them. But I'd like something quickier. For example, when I'm using my OSX Mac at work, I can easily add a ©, ™, ® or similar symbols, just pressing some weird ALT-GR + G / H / J, key combinations. In my (Spanish) keyboard mapping, these combinations are empty, as they don't produce any char at all, which, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and desirable. So, I thought: Why couldn't I add some extra key mappings on top of my currently empty ALT-GR + G/J/H Keys in my Spanish keyboard, and thus, being able to quickly type these special symbols? So that's my question: Is there any utility/method to achieve that effect under windows? (My version is XP). I've even googled this for some time but no luck. I've been a long term Hot...

virtualization - How to select paravirtualization interface in VirtualBox?

Given a windows 8 host system (Intel Core i5) and a Linux Fedora host, I would like to determine the optimal setting for the paravirtual interface. Options are none Default Legacy minimal Hyper-V KVM This page suggest the selection is only based on the guest system: The biggest change in VirtualBox 5.0 is the introduction of paravirtualization support, bringing higher performance and time-keeping accuracy to supported guest operating systems (Hyper-V on Windows and KVM on Linux). Is that correct? Answer The VirtualBox Manual , in the section titled Paravirtualization providers explains very clearly when each should be used (emphasis added): Minimal: Announces the presence of a virtualized environment. Additionally, reports the TSC and APIC frequency to the guest operating system. This provider is mandatory for running any Mac OS X guests. KVM: Presents a Linux KVM hypervisor interface which is recognized by Linux kernels starting with version 2.6.25. VirtualBox's implementati...

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...

security - How is Linux not prone to viruses, malware and those kinds of things?

How is Linux protected against viruses? This question was a Super User Question of the Week . Read the blog entry for more details or contribute to the blog yourself Answer Well, it factually is not... it's just less subject to hackers developing viruses that target Linux systems. Consumer grade computers usually run on Windows and thus, when targeting a wide audience, Windows is the way to go. Don't misunderstand Linux and viruses, there definitely ARE Linux viruses. Some distros have additional protection layers such as SELinux (See here ) in Ubuntu for example. Then there's the default firewall and the fact that alien files don't automatically have permission to be executed. Specific execution permission has to be granted before execution is possible. (See here ) Then there are several other factors that make Linux a hard place to be for viruses usually non-root users on linux systems have no to little executable files at their disposal that would allow for virus...