Skip to main content

Where to install small programs without installers on Windows?


On the Windows platform, most large applications come with their own installer which sets up folders under C:\Program Files, possibly some other places, and perhaps adding some registry keys, etc.


But there's still quite a few tools around that consist of just an .exe or maybe also a README and a .dll or two.


How should I install such tools? Directly in C:\Program Files? All in one subfolder under C:\Program Files? Somewhere under C:\Users\Me? Somewhere totally different?


Or maybe different approaches for the tools with just an .exe to those that also have other files, or maybe only the ones with .dlls need to be treated differenty ...


Is there any standard accepted way to do this? A "best practice"? If the answer depends on the Windows version, I'm using Windows 7.


In particular, what might strike people as the obvious answer seems to have a catch:


I had tried to manually create new subfolders under C:\Program Files. In fact I thought I had done so before, but Windows puts up a dialog Destination Folder Access Denied. This caused me to think twice rather than just blindly click Continue.


Destination Folder Access Denied


On the assumption that greater minds than mine have come up against this many times over the years I'd like to ask the community if some kind of "best practice" has come to be accepted.



Answer



Use C:\Tools


or C:\Users\\Tools
 


I'm using many small programs without installer and I'm recommending the following:



  • Save them all into C:\Tools

  • If a program consists of single file, put it directly under C:\Tools

  • If a program consists of multiple files, put it under C:\Tools\ProgramName

  • SysInternals tools have a special category C:\Tools\_SysInternals because there is many of them


I'm simply moving C:\Tools from machine to machine when migrating, works like a charm.


Practical sample (shortened listing):



C:\Tools\autoexec-elevated.bat
C:\Tools\cleanup.bat
C:\Tools\BabelMap.exe
C:\Tools\netmon.exe
C:\Tools\notifu.exe
C:\Tools\putty.exe
C:\Tools\UDPixel.exe
C:\Tools\battery.vbs

C:\Tools\3dclip-1.5.1\
C:\Tools\alternatestreamview\
C:\Tools\blender-2.71-windows64\
C:\Tools\Notepad++\
C:\Tools\QueryExpress\
C:\Tools\winscp555\
C:\Tools\Xinorbis\

C:\Tools\_Sysinternals\accesschk\
C:\Tools\_Sysinternals\Autoruns\
C:\Tools\_Sysinternals\depends22_x64\
C:\Tools\_Sysinternals\depends22_x86\
C:\Tools\_Sysinternals\LogonSessions\

I hope this gives an idea.


EDIT: Extended info


I suppose that under install in your question How should I install such tools? you actually mean manual setup, something like copying the files.


Rule of thumb: Use manually created folders for manually maintained files. Let system folders to be used by (installation) processes you don't directly control. You will immediately get benefit of recognition which content is 'yours' (and you can freely copy it) and which application is managed by the installer.


So when installing manually (by copying), stay away from



  • C:\Program Files - programs found here cannot be simply migrated, must be reinstalled (gives a great hint for migration)

  • C:\Program Files (x86) - as the above, but on 64-bit systems, 32-bit programs go here (can give a hint to determine whether particular app is 32-bit or 64-bit)

  • C:\ProgramData - application storages found here show that these programs maintain some of their data in their own way. But you asked about putting your programs under Data? Not a good idea.

  • C:\Users\Steven\AppData - again, putting programs under Data is not a good idea. If you asked about data, then several interesting things can be written about this path. But for programs simply 'no'. :)


Possible path



  • C:\Users\Steven - can be your alternative root if this is a shared computer and you want to keep it tidy, so you decide not to create any global directories. You can consider C:\Users\Steven\Tools for your programs or even C:\Users\Steven\Desktop\Tools if you want to use comfortable Desktop folder access available via shortcut from many places in Windows. But better can be the former one and you can still place the shortcut to this folder to desktop or whenever needed.



Edit: Additional useful hint:


If you want to make some of your small programs recognized in Windows 10 Start menu (for incremental searching of their names or instant elevated start using Ctrl+Shift+Enter), add their shortcuts there and launch them once. (Then you can remove them.)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

keyboard - Is there any utility/method to change Windows key bindings to type rare chars to currently empty bindings?

I'm currently typing this post with my windows XP machine and (Spanish) keyboard, and I'd like to add some extra symbols to my text. I could open the "char map" windows utility, look for the desired symbols, and paste them. But I'd like something quickier. For example, when I'm using my OSX Mac at work, I can easily add a ©, ™, ® or similar symbols, just pressing some weird ALT-GR + G / H / J, key combinations. In my (Spanish) keyboard mapping, these combinations are empty, as they don't produce any char at all, which, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and desirable. So, I thought: Why couldn't I add some extra key mappings on top of my currently empty ALT-GR + G/J/H Keys in my Spanish keyboard, and thus, being able to quickly type these special symbols? So that's my question: Is there any utility/method to achieve that effect under windows? (My version is XP). I've even googled this for some time but no luck. I've been a long term Hot...
Post a Comment
Read more

virtualization - How to select paravirtualization interface in VirtualBox?

Given a windows 8 host system (Intel Core i5) and a Linux Fedora host, I would like to determine the optimal setting for the paravirtual interface. Options are none Default Legacy minimal Hyper-V KVM This page suggest the selection is only based on the guest system: The biggest change in VirtualBox 5.0 is the introduction of paravirtualization support, bringing higher performance and time-keeping accuracy to supported guest operating systems (Hyper-V on Windows and KVM on Linux). Is that correct? Answer The VirtualBox Manual , in the section titled Paravirtualization providers explains very clearly when each should be used (emphasis added): Minimal: Announces the presence of a virtualized environment. Additionally, reports the TSC and APIC frequency to the guest operating system. This provider is mandatory for running any Mac OS X guests. KVM: Presents a Linux KVM hypervisor interface which is recognized by Linux kernels starting with version 2.6.25. VirtualBox's implementati...
Post a Comment
Read more

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...
Post a Comment
Read more

security - How is Linux not prone to viruses, malware and those kinds of things?

How is Linux protected against viruses? This question was a Super User Question of the Week . Read the blog entry for more details or contribute to the blog yourself Answer Well, it factually is not... it's just less subject to hackers developing viruses that target Linux systems. Consumer grade computers usually run on Windows and thus, when targeting a wide audience, Windows is the way to go. Don't misunderstand Linux and viruses, there definitely ARE Linux viruses. Some distros have additional protection layers such as SELinux (See here ) in Ubuntu for example. Then there's the default firewall and the fact that alien files don't automatically have permission to be executed. Specific execution permission has to be granted before execution is possible. (See here ) Then there are several other factors that make Linux a hard place to be for viruses usually non-root users on linux systems have no to little executable files at their disposal that would allow for virus...
Post a Comment
Read more