Skip to main content

debian - Cannot read protected DVDs on shell / headless system

Can anybody help me? I'm trying to get access to read protected DVDs for hours now. Attaching USB drive to a Windows PC works fine - all DVDs can be read, also inside an Xubuntu virtual machine on the related host all is fine. But when installing OpenMediaVault as host system, I can read only non-protected DVDs. Because it works 100% inside a guest it's not hardware related.


# uname -a
Linux nas 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux


# dpkg -l libdvdread4 libdvdcss2 libdvdnav4
Gewünscht=Unbekannt/Installieren/R=Entfernen/P=Vollständig Löschen/Halten
| Status=Nicht/Installiert/Config/U=Entpackt/halb konFiguriert/
Halb installiert/Trigger erWartet/Trigger anhängig
|/ Fehler?=(kein)/R=Neuinstallation notwendig (Status, Fehler: GROSS=schlecht)
||/ Name Version Architektur Beschreibung
+++-===========================================-==========================-==========================-====================================
ii libdvdcss2:amd64 1.4.0-1~local amd64 library for accessing encrypted DVDs
ii libdvdnav4:amd64 5.0.1-1 amd64 DVD navigation library
ii libdvdread4:amd64 5.0.0-1 amd64 library for reading DVDs


# dmesg
[ 3184.701656] usb 3-1.1: USB disconnect, device number 6
[ 3196.173818] usb 3-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 7 using ehci-pci
[ 3196.272569] usb 3-1.1: New USB device found, idVendor=067b, idProduct=2571
[ 3196.272579] usb 3-1.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
[ 3196.272586] usb 3-1.1: Product: SLIM Portable Blu-ray Drive
[ 3196.272591] usb 3-1.1: Manufacturer: HLDS Inc.
[ 3196.272597] usb 3-1.1: SerialNumber: PROLIFICMP000000376
[ 3196.273202] usb-storage 3-1.1:1.0: USB Mass Storage device detected
[ 3196.273564] scsi8 : usb-storage 3-1.1:1.0
[ 3197.397138] scsi 8:0:0:0: CD-ROM HL-DT-ST BD-RE BP55EB40 1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
[ 3197.486298] sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 0x/24x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
[ 3197.486731] sr 8:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
[ 3197.487181] sr 8:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 5
[ 3216.362379] sr 8:0:0:0: [sr0]
[ 3216.362388] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 3216.362392] sr 8:0:0:0: [sr0]
[ 3216.362396] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
[ 3216.362402] sr 8:0:0:0: [sr0]
[ 3216.362408] Add. Sense: Read of scrambled sector without authentication
[ 3216.362413] sr 8:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB:
[ 3216.362416] Read(10): 28 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 02 00
[ 3216.362429] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 4096
[ 3216.362514] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 512
[ 3216.427062] sr 8:0:0:0: [sr0]
[ 3216.427069] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 3216.427074] sr 8:0:0:0: [sr0]
[ 3216.427077] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
[ 3216.427083] sr 8:0:0:0: [sr0]
[ 3216.427089] Add. Sense: Read of scrambled sector without authentication
[ 3216.427094] sr 8:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB:
[ 3216.427096] Read(10): 28 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 02 00
[ 3216.427110] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 4096
[ 3216.427195] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 512


# udevadm info /dev/sr0
P: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:16.0/usb3/3-1/3-1.1/3-1.1:1.0/host8/target8:0:0/8:0:0:0/block/sr0
N: sr0
L: -100
S: cdrom
S: cdrw
S: disk/by-id/usb-HL-DT-ST_BD-RE_BP55EB40_PROLIFICMP000000376-0:0
S: disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:16.0-usb-0:1.1:1.0-scsi-0:0:0:0
S: dvd
S: dvdrw
E: DEVLINKS=/dev/disk/by-id/usb-HL-DT-ST_BD-RE_BP55EB40_PROLIFICMP000000376-0:0 /dev/dvd /dev/cdrom /dev/cdrw /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:16.0-usb-0:1.1:1.0-scsi-0:0:0:0 /dev/dvdrw
E: DEVNAME=/dev/sr0
E: DEVPATH=/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:16.0/usb3/3-1/3-1.1/3-1.1:1.0/host8/target8:0:0/8:0:0:0/block/sr0
E: DEVTYPE=disk
E: ID_BUS=usb
E: ID_CDROM=1
E: ID_CDROM_BD=1
E: ID_CDROM_BD_R=1
E: ID_CDROM_BD_RE=1
E: ID_CDROM_CD=1
E: ID_CDROM_CD_R=1
E: ID_CDROM_CD_RW=1
E: ID_CDROM_DVD=1
E: ID_CDROM_DVD_PLUS_R=1
E: ID_CDROM_DVD_PLUS_RW=1
E: ID_CDROM_DVD_PLUS_R_DL=1
E: ID_CDROM_DVD_R=1
E: ID_CDROM_DVD_RAM=1
E: ID_CDROM_DVD_RW=1
E: ID_CDROM_MEDIA=1
E: ID_CDROM_MEDIA_DVD=1
E: ID_CDROM_MEDIA_SESSION_COUNT=1
E: ID_CDROM_MEDIA_STATE=complete
E: ID_CDROM_MEDIA_TRACK_COUNT=1
E: ID_CDROM_MEDIA_TRACK_COUNT_DATA=1
E: ID_CDROM_MRW=1
E: ID_CDROM_MRW_W=1
E: ID_FOR_SEAT=block-pci-0000_00_16_0-usb-0_1_1_1_0-scsi-0_0_0_0
E: ID_INSTANCE=0:0
E: ID_MODEL=BD-RE_BP55EB40
E: ID_MODEL_ENC=BD-RE\x20BP55EB40\x20\x20
E: ID_MODEL_ID=2571
E: ID_PATH=pci-0000:00:16.0-usb-0:1.1:1.0-scsi-0:0:0:0
E: ID_PATH_TAG=pci-0000_00_16_0-usb-0_1_1_1_0-scsi-0_0_0_0
E: ID_REVISION=1.00
E: ID_SERIAL=HL-DT-ST_BD-RE_BP55EB40_PROLIFICMP000000376-0:0
E: ID_SERIAL_SHORT=PROLIFICMP000000376
E: ID_TYPE=cd
E: ID_USB_DRIVER=usb-storage
E: ID_USB_INTERFACES=:080650:
E: ID_USB_INTERFACE_NUM=00
E: ID_VENDOR=HL-DT-ST
E: ID_VENDOR_ENC=HL-DT-ST
E: ID_VENDOR_ID=067b
E: MAJOR=11
E: MINOR=0
E: SUBSYSTEM=block
E: TAGS=:systemd:uaccess:seat:
E: USEC_INITIALIZED=3195163408

As you can see, for these read-protected video DVDs there is no ID_FS_TYPE and ID_FS_LABEL returned. What's the reason for this all?




It seems, that these scrambled sector errors appear in different distributions as long as you didn't access the DVD by a movie player which itself uses libdvdcss for access. I've setup Debian and Ubuntu a lot of times now and my last tests show, that an Ubuntu 16.04 Server is able to show the ID_FS_LABEL/TYPE informations from copy protected DVDs, but Debian 8.6 isn't.


What's the difference between those two Linux distributions that one works while another don't?

Comments

Popular Posts

Use Google instead of Bing with Windows 10 search

I want to use Google Chrome and Google search instead of Bing when I search in Windows 10. Google Chrome is launched when I click on web, but it's Bing search. (My default search engine on Google and Edge is http://www.google.com ) I haven't found how to configure that. Someone can help me ? Answer There is no way to change the default in Cortana itself but you can redirect it in Chrome. You said that it opens the results in the Chrome browser but it used Bing search right? There's a Chrome extension now that will redirect Bing to Google, DuckDuckGo, or Yahoo , whichever you prefer. More information on that in the second link.

linux - Using an index to make grep faster?

I find myself grepping the same codebase over and over. While it works great, each command takes about 10 seconds, so I am thinking about ways to make it faster. So can grep use some sort of index? I understand an index probably won't help for complicated regexps, but I use mostly very simple patters. Does an indexer exist for this case? EDIT: I know about ctags and the like, but I would like to do full-text search. Answer what about cscope , does this match your shoes? Allows searching code for: all references to a symbol global definitions functions called by a function functions calling a function text string regular expression pattern a file files including a file

How do I transmit a single hexadecimal value serial data in PuTTY using an Alt code?

I am trying to sent a specific hexadecimal value across a serial COM port using PuTTY. Specifically, I want to send the hex codes 9C, B6, FC, and 8B. I have looked up the Alt codes for these and they are 156, 182, 252, and 139 respectively. However, whenever I input the Alt codes, a preceding hex value of C2 is sent before 9C, B6, and 8B so the values that are sent are C2 9C, C2 B6, and C2 8B. The value for FC is changed to C3 FC. Why are these values being placed before the hex value and why is FC being changed altogether? To me, it seems like there is a problem internally converting the Alt code to hex. Is there a way to directly input hex values without using Alt codes in PuTTY? Answer What you're seeing is just ordinary text character set conversion. As far as PuTTY is concerned, you are typing (and reading) text , not raw binary data, therefore it has to convert the text to bytes in whatever configured character set before sending it over the wire. In other words, when y

networking - Windows 10, can ping other PC but cannot access shared folders! What gives?

I have a computer running Windows 7 that shares a Git repo on drive D. Let's call this PC " win7 ". This repo is the origin of a project that we push to and pull from. The network is a wireless network. One PC on this network is running on Windows 10. Let's call this PC " win10 ". Win10 can ping every other PC on the network including win7 . Win7 can ping win10 . Win7 can access all shared files on win10 . Neither of the PCs have passwords. Problem : Win10 cannot access any shared files on win7 , not from Explorer, nor from Git Bash or any other Git management system (E-Git on Eclipse or Visual Studio). So, win10 cannot pull/push. Every other PC on the network can access win7 shared files and push/pull to/from the shared Git origin. What's wrong with Windows 10? I have tried these: Control Panel\All Control Panel Items\Network and Sharing Center\Advanced sharing settings\ File sharing is on, Discovery is on, Password protected sharing is off Adapte