Skip to main content

apache http server - Wordpress Permalinks not working in Nginx


I'm moving my wordpress blog from Apache to Nginx. I've tried multiple tutorials to get permalinks working but nothing is working for me. My website structure is like this:


main site -> www.localhost.com

wordpress blog -> www.localhost.com/blog

Website is in /var/www/html and wordpress is installed in /var/www/html/blog


I've read multiple articles and watched multiple videos but nothing seems to be working. Please let me know where I'm going wrong.


I've defined two server blocks in /etc/nginx/sites-available/default one for main site and one for the blog.


# Default server configuration
#
server {
listen 80 default_server;
listen [::]:80 default_server;

# SSL configuration
#
# listen 443 ssl default_server;
# listen [::]:443 ssl default_server;
#
# Note: You should disable gzip for SSL traffic.
# See: https://bugs.debian.org/773332
#
# Read up on ssl_ciphers to ensure a secure configuration.
# See: https://bugs.debian.org/765782
#
# Self signed certs generated by the ssl-cert package
# Don't use them in a production server!
#
# include snippets/snakeoil.conf;

root /var/www/html;

# Add index.php to the list if you are using PHP
index index.php index.html index.htm index.nginx-debian.html;

server_name _;

charset utf-8;
error_page 404 /404.php;

location /article {
rewrite ^/article.* / redirect;
}

#location / {
# try_files $uri $uri/ /loadpage.php?$args;
#}

location ~ \.html$ {
try_files $uri /courses/index.php?$args;
}





# pass the PHP scripts to FastCGI server listening on 127.0.0.1:9000
#
location ~ \.php$ {
include snippets/fastcgi-php.conf;
#
# # With php7.0-cgi alone:
# fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
# With php7.0-fpm:
fastcgi_pass unix:/var/run/php/php7.0-fpm.sock;
include fastcgi_params;

}

# deny access to .htaccess files, if Apache's document root
# concurs with nginx's one
#
location ~ /\.ht {
deny all;
}
}



server {
listen 80;
listen [::]:80;
root /var/www/html/blog;
index index.php index.html index.htm;
server_name example.com www.example.com;

location /blog/ {
try_files $uri $uri/ /blog/index.php?$args;
}


location ~ \.php$ {
fastcgi_split_path_info ^(.+\.php)(/.+)$;
fastcgi_index index.php;
# fastcgi_pass unix:/var/run/php/php7.1-fpm.sock; #Ubuntu 17.10
fastcgi_pass unix:/var/run/php/php7.0-fpm.sock; #Ubuntu 17.04
include fastcgi_params;
fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $fastcgi_path_info;
fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $document_root$fastcgi_script_name;
}

}

Answer



By creating multiple server blocks for the same domain you are effectively creating a collision between the virtual servers. server blocks define what Nginx will listen for. If there are multiple virtual servers for a given port, the request will be passed on to a virtual server with the best matching server_name. By having multiple identical virtual servers, Nginx will have no way of telling where to pass it to.


Your main site and WordPress are under the same domain (and the same port) and thus should go in a single virtual server. You separate them using location blocks.


Take caution with the Nginx block selection algorithm, regular expression blocks are always evaluated before normal blocks. In your example everything ending with .html is send to your main site. This may interfere with WordPress when it tries to use URI's ending with .html as well. To prevent this, you can use nested location blocks. By moving the regular expression location block inside / it will only be evaluated when the parent location matches. When a request comes in for /blog, the /blog location block will be the best matching one and therefore will be selected over the / one. Because the regular expression block is now nested inside there, it won't be evaluated for requests to WordPress.


# Default server configuration
#
server {
listen 80 default_server;
listen [::]:80 default_server;

# SSL configuration
#
# listen 443 ssl default_server;
# listen [::]:443 ssl default_server;
#
# Note: You should disable gzip for SSL traffic.
# See: https://bugs.debian.org/773332
#
# Read up on ssl_ciphers to ensure a secure configuration.
# See: https://bugs.debian.org/765782
#
# Self signed certs generated by the ssl-cert package
# Don't use them in a production server!
#
# include snippets/snakeoil.conf;

root /var/www/html;

# Add index.php to the list if you are using PHP
index index.php index.html index.htm index.nginx-debian.html;

server_name _;

charset utf-8;
error_page 404 /404.php;

location /article {
rewrite ^/article.* / redirect;
}

location / {
location ~ \.html$ {
try_files $uri /courses/index.php?$args;
}

try_files $uri $uri/ /loadpage.php?$args;
}

location /blog/ {
try_files $uri $uri/ /blog/index.php?$args;
}

# pass the PHP scripts to FastCGI server listening on 127.0.0.1:9000
#
location ~ \.php$ {
include snippets/fastcgi-php.conf;
#
# # With php7.0-cgi alone:
# fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000;
# With php7.0-fpm:
fastcgi_pass unix:/var/run/php/php7.0-fpm.sock;
include fastcgi_params;

}

# deny access to .htaccess files, if Apache's document root
# concurs with nginx's one
#
location ~ /\.ht {
deny all;
}
}

Comments

Popular Posts

Use Google instead of Bing with Windows 10 search

I want to use Google Chrome and Google search instead of Bing when I search in Windows 10. Google Chrome is launched when I click on web, but it's Bing search. (My default search engine on Google and Edge is http://www.google.com ) I haven't found how to configure that. Someone can help me ? Answer There is no way to change the default in Cortana itself but you can redirect it in Chrome. You said that it opens the results in the Chrome browser but it used Bing search right? There's a Chrome extension now that will redirect Bing to Google, DuckDuckGo, or Yahoo , whichever you prefer. More information on that in the second link.

linux - Using an index to make grep faster?

I find myself grepping the same codebase over and over. While it works great, each command takes about 10 seconds, so I am thinking about ways to make it faster. So can grep use some sort of index? I understand an index probably won't help for complicated regexps, but I use mostly very simple patters. Does an indexer exist for this case? EDIT: I know about ctags and the like, but I would like to do full-text search. Answer what about cscope , does this match your shoes? Allows searching code for: all references to a symbol global definitions functions called by a function functions calling a function text string regular expression pattern a file files including a file

How do I transmit a single hexadecimal value serial data in PuTTY using an Alt code?

I am trying to sent a specific hexadecimal value across a serial COM port using PuTTY. Specifically, I want to send the hex codes 9C, B6, FC, and 8B. I have looked up the Alt codes for these and they are 156, 182, 252, and 139 respectively. However, whenever I input the Alt codes, a preceding hex value of C2 is sent before 9C, B6, and 8B so the values that are sent are C2 9C, C2 B6, and C2 8B. The value for FC is changed to C3 FC. Why are these values being placed before the hex value and why is FC being changed altogether? To me, it seems like there is a problem internally converting the Alt code to hex. Is there a way to directly input hex values without using Alt codes in PuTTY? Answer What you're seeing is just ordinary text character set conversion. As far as PuTTY is concerned, you are typing (and reading) text , not raw binary data, therefore it has to convert the text to bytes in whatever configured character set before sending it over the wire. In other words, when y

networking - Windows 10, can ping other PC but cannot access shared folders! What gives?

I have a computer running Windows 7 that shares a Git repo on drive D. Let's call this PC " win7 ". This repo is the origin of a project that we push to and pull from. The network is a wireless network. One PC on this network is running on Windows 10. Let's call this PC " win10 ". Win10 can ping every other PC on the network including win7 . Win7 can ping win10 . Win7 can access all shared files on win10 . Neither of the PCs have passwords. Problem : Win10 cannot access any shared files on win7 , not from Explorer, nor from Git Bash or any other Git management system (E-Git on Eclipse or Visual Studio). So, win10 cannot pull/push. Every other PC on the network can access win7 shared files and push/pull to/from the shared Git origin. What's wrong with Windows 10? I have tried these: Control Panel\All Control Panel Items\Network and Sharing Center\Advanced sharing settings\ File sharing is on, Discovery is on, Password protected sharing is off Adapte