Skip to main content

Veracrypt full disk encryption multi-boot Windows 10 and two Linux Distro on same SSD with some shared folders?


Never tried something like that, but this would be my preferred setup. I dislike VMWare and Virtual Box because they are slow.


Is this setup possible? And what would be the procedure to achieve this roughly?



Answer



In my opinion the downvotes to this question are pretty much unjustified as finally I easily achieved what I have asked for. First of all full drive encryption with veracrypt is possible (https://medium.com/@securitystreak/veracrypt-full-disk-drive-encryption-fde-157eacbf0b61).


Second thing is that partition encryption with multiple OSes on the same disk as well as full drive encryption with different hard drives and multiple OSes works very well. This is how to setup for the first case:




  1. You can go ahead and encrypt your Windows system partition as if it was the only OS installed on your PC. Your UEFI boot manager will get a new entry called “VeraCrypt BootLoader (DcsBoot)” or something to this extent. Your mileage may vary, but most likely it will become the default one, which means that on boot you will bypass Grub, losing access to your other OSes.




  2. Don’t worry. From Windows, download and install Hasleo EasyUEFI and change the order of boot loaders. All you need to do is move your Grub loader back above the VeraCrypt loader. If you have Ubuntu, the Grub loader is probably called “ubuntu.” I cannot vouch for other distros or non-grub loaders, but in general the idea remains the same. I recommend using EasyUEFI and noting the file path for the VeraCrypt boot loader. This will come in handy in step 4. However, it is normally also possible to change the order of boot loaders from the BIOS/UEFI setup.




  3. Now, when you reboot, you should see your old and trusty boot menu. If you don’t, you might have to boot and run Boot-Repair. Once you have the menu, you will most likely be disappointed to find out that the “Windows” entry tries to load Windows directly off the encrypted partition, fails miserably, tries to repair it, and fails miserably again. This happens because the entry is pointing to the old Windows loader, bypassing the VeraCrypt loader completely. Thankfully, this is extremely easy to fix.




  4. Reboot into Linux and modify your Grub config. You will see that the Windows entry is pointing to the Windows EFI loader (likely \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi). You should modify it to point to the VeraCrypt loader again. As reported by EasyUEFI (step 2), in my case, it is \EFI\VeraCrypt\DcsBoot.efi.




This great tutorial is by Lanky Cyril @medium.com (https://medium.com/@lankycyril/using-veracrypt-with-a-uefi-dual-boot-setup-27d1eacbf36b).


Additional information (edit):



  • Some special operations might not be possible on the shared devices due to permission problems with NTFS/exFAT and Linux (but this is rare).

  • Many app profiles can be shared accross both systems though like e.g. a Mozilla Thunderbird profile.

  • If you install Veracrypt 1.23 or higher you can update Windows 10 without any problems.

  • In my opinion it is not necessary to use Haeslo EasyUEFI (it is Shareware). Just change the order of boot loaders in your BIOS, save and you are done. In case you have problems with boot sequences, also just try to change the order in your BIOS first.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

How do I transmit a single hexadecimal value serial data in PuTTY using an Alt code?

I am trying to sent a specific hexadecimal value across a serial COM port using PuTTY. Specifically, I want to send the hex codes 9C, B6, FC, and 8B. I have looked up the Alt codes for these and they are 156, 182, 252, and 139 respectively. However, whenever I input the Alt codes, a preceding hex value of C2 is sent before 9C, B6, and 8B so the values that are sent are C2 9C, C2 B6, and C2 8B. The value for FC is changed to C3 FC. Why are these values being placed before the hex value and why is FC being changed altogether? To me, it seems like there is a problem internally converting the Alt code to hex. Is there a way to directly input hex values without using Alt codes in PuTTY? Answer What you're seeing is just ordinary text character set conversion. As far as PuTTY is concerned, you are typing (and reading) text , not raw binary data, therefore it has to convert the text to bytes in whatever configured character set before sending it over the wire. In other words, when y...
Post a Comment
Read more

linux - Extract/save a mail attachment using bash

Using normal bash tools (ie, built-ins or commonly-available command-line tools), is it possible, and how to extract/save attachments on emails? For example, say I have a nightly report which arrives via email but is a zip archive of several log files. I want to save all those zips into a backup directory. How would I accomplish that? Answer If you're aiming for portability, beware that there are several different versions of mail(1) and mailx(1) . There's a POSIX mailx command, but with very few requirements. And none of the implementations I have seem to parse attachments anyway. You might have the mpack package . Its munpack command saves all parts of a MIME message into separate files, then all you have to do is save the interesting parts and clean up the rest. There's also metamail . An equivalent of munpack is metamail -wy .
Post a Comment
Read more

performance - Single Threaded Qaud Core v.s Hyper-Threading Dual Core

Let's say we have two CPUs, One is Quad Core 3.2 Ghz with 4 Cores, and We have a Dual Core 3.2 Ghz with 2 Cores with 2 threads in each Core (Hyper-Threading). My assumption as a programmer will be, the 4 cores 4 threads should perform faster than 2 cores 4 threads since the second CPU needs to switch between threads in order to emulate 4 cores while the first one doesn't need to perform such switching as each core can perform independently and individually. I want to confirm that my assumption is true, if not please explain why one is better than the other. Answer I do believe thats true - since hyper threading does share some elements - specifically the main execution resources, you'll be able to run 4 full threads at once, rather than waiting for those resources to be freed up. The point of HT is to get better performance with a smaller use of die area - your quad core would generally be a bigger chip - say almost twice as large, than a non HT dual core chip, while a HT...
Post a Comment
Read more

freeze - How do I stop windows 8.1 from freezing when the screen locks

This happens to me on a regular basis if I leave the computer for upwards of 10 minutes. It didnt do so at first but started after a couple of days. This is possibly related to further windows updates although nothing seems to tie in obviously when looking at my update history. I have to hold the power button in to power off. If the screens have switched off aswell they wont come back on, if they haven't I see the login picture and can move the mouse pointer but nothing happens and no combination of keyboard mashes or mouse clicks lets me see the login prompt. In the event log (type event viewer into the start menu) under system before every Critical problem (me powering down the machine without restarting) I get distributedCOM errors talking about this guid: "The server {BF6C1E47-86EC-4194-9CE5-13C15DCB2001} did not register with DCOM within the required timeout." I also get the same error for this 1B1F472E-3221-4826-97DB-2C2324D389AE. This seems to be a common theme and...
Post a Comment
Read more