Skip to main content

linux - Prevent Radeon driver from attaching to specific PCI devices?


I have two Radeon cards in this machine, a Radeon HD 6570 and a Radeon HD 6950:


lspci | grep VGA


01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Turks [Radeon HD 6570]
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Cayman PRO [Radeon HD 6950]



I'm trying to get VGA passthrough to work with KVM on Debian 7 (Wheezy), passing through the 6950 as a secondary video card to a Windows 7 guest. This works fine if I blacklist the radeon kernel module via /etc/modprobe.d/.


If I remove the blacklist to run X11 (or even just a KMS console) on the 6570 the radeon module seems to attach to both cards:


dmesg | egrep "01:00.0|02:00.0|radeon"



pci 0000:01:00.0: [1002:6759] type 0 class 0x000300
pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 10: [mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 18: [mem 0xf7e20000-0xf7e3ffff 64bit]
pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 20: [io 0xe000-0xe0ff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 30: [mem 0xf7e00000-0xf7e1ffff pref]
pci 0000:01:00.0: supports D1 D2
pci 0000:02:00.0: [1002:6719] type 0 class 0x000300
pci 0000:02:00.0: reg 10: [mem 0xd0000000-0xdfffffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:02:00.0: reg 18: [mem 0xf7d20000-0xf7d3ffff 64bit]
pci 0000:02:00.0: reg 20: [io 0xd000-0xd0ff]
pci 0000:02:00.0: reg 30: [mem 0xf7d00000-0xf7d1ffff pref]
pci 0000:02:00.0: supports D1 D2
vgaarb: device added: PCI:0000:01:00.0,decodes=io+mem,owns=io+mem,locks=none
vgaarb: device added: PCI:0000:02:00.0,decodes=io+mem,owns=none,locks=none
vgaarb: bridge control possible 0000:02:00.0
vgaarb: bridge control possible 0000:01:00.0
pci 0000:01:00.0: Boot video device
[drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled.
radeon 0000:01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
radeon 0000:01:00.0: VRAM: 1024M 0x0000000000000000 - 0x000000003FFFFFFF (1024M used)
radeon 0000:01:00.0: GTT: 512M 0x0000000040000000 - 0x000000005FFFFFFF
[drm] radeon: 1024M of VRAM memory ready
[drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready.
radeon 0000:01:00.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
radeon 0000:01:00.0: radeon: using MSI.
[drm] radeon: irq initialized.
radeon 0000:01:00.0: WB enabled
[drm] radeon: ib pool ready.
[drm] radeon: power management initialized
fbcon: radeondrmfb (fb0) is primary device
fb0: radeondrmfb frame buffer device
[drm] Initialized radeon 2.12.0 20080528 for 0000:01:00.0 on minor 0
radeon 0000:02:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
radeon 0000:02:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
radeon 0000:02:00.0: VRAM: 2048M 0x0000000000000000 - 0x000000007FFFFFFF (2048M used)
radeon 0000:02:00.0: GTT: 512M 0x0000000080000000 - 0x000000009FFFFFFF
[drm] radeon: 2048M of VRAM memory ready
[drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready.
radeon 0000:02:00.0: irq 49 for MSI/MSI-X
radeon 0000:02:00.0: radeon: using MSI.
[drm] radeon: irq initialized.
radeon 0000:02:00.0: WB enabled
[drm] radeon: ib pool ready.
[drm] radeon: power management initialized
fb1: radeondrmfb frame buffer device
[drm] Initialized radeon 2.12.0 20080528 for 0000:02:00.0 on minor 1
[drm] radeon: finishing device.
radeon 0000:02:00.0: ffff88041a941800 unpin not necessary
[drm] radeon: ttm finalized
pci-stub 0000:02:00.0: claimed by stub
pci-stub 0000:02:00.0: irq 49 for MSI/MSI-X



This causes the Windows 7 VM to bluescreen on boot.


How can I configure things so that module radeon only attaches to the 6570 and not the 6950?



Answer



I had had some pci_stub-related lines in my rc.local but this was apparently too late in the boot process to help, running after radeon started fiddling with things.


I fixed things by moving the pci_stub kernel module stuff to the initramfs:




  1. lspci -nn | grep Cayman to find the vendor:device numbers (at the very end of the line) for the 6950 and its HDMI port:


    02:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Cayman PRO [Radeon HD 6950] [1002:6719]
    02:00.1 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Cayman/Antilles HDMI Audio [Radeon HD 6900 Series] [1002:aa80]


  2. Pop open /etc/initramfs-tools/modules and add a new line:


    pci_stub ids=1002:6719,1002:aa80


  3. Rebuild the initramfs:


    sudo update-initramfs -u


  4. Reboot and observe pci_stub beating out radeon:


    dmesg | egrep "pci-stub|radeon"

    pci-stub: add 1002:6719 sub=FFFFFFFF:FFFFFFFF cls=00000000/00000000
    pci-stub 0000:02:00.0: claimed by stub
    pci-stub: add 1002:AA80 sub=FFFFFFFF:FFFFFFFF cls=00000000/00000000
    pci-stub 0000:02:00.1: claimed by stub
    [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled.
    radeon 0000:01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
    radeon 0000:01:00.0: VRAM: 1024M 0x0000000000000000 - 0x000000003FFFFFFF (1024M used)
    radeon 0000:01:00.0: GTT: 512M 0x0000000040000000 - 0x000000005FFFFFFF


  5. Enjoy bluescreen-free VGA passthrough!




Comments

Popular Posts

How do I transmit a single hexadecimal value serial data in PuTTY using an Alt code?

I am trying to sent a specific hexadecimal value across a serial COM port using PuTTY. Specifically, I want to send the hex codes 9C, B6, FC, and 8B. I have looked up the Alt codes for these and they are 156, 182, 252, and 139 respectively. However, whenever I input the Alt codes, a preceding hex value of C2 is sent before 9C, B6, and 8B so the values that are sent are C2 9C, C2 B6, and C2 8B. The value for FC is changed to C3 FC. Why are these values being placed before the hex value and why is FC being changed altogether? To me, it seems like there is a problem internally converting the Alt code to hex. Is there a way to directly input hex values without using Alt codes in PuTTY? Answer What you're seeing is just ordinary text character set conversion. As far as PuTTY is concerned, you are typing (and reading) text , not raw binary data, therefore it has to convert the text to bytes in whatever configured character set before sending it over the wire. In other words, when y...

linux - Extract/save a mail attachment using bash

Using normal bash tools (ie, built-ins or commonly-available command-line tools), is it possible, and how to extract/save attachments on emails? For example, say I have a nightly report which arrives via email but is a zip archive of several log files. I want to save all those zips into a backup directory. How would I accomplish that? Answer If you're aiming for portability, beware that there are several different versions of mail(1) and mailx(1) . There's a POSIX mailx command, but with very few requirements. And none of the implementations I have seem to parse attachments anyway. You might have the mpack package . Its munpack command saves all parts of a MIME message into separate files, then all you have to do is save the interesting parts and clean up the rest. There's also metamail . An equivalent of munpack is metamail -wy .

keyboard - Is there any utility/method to change Windows key bindings to type rare chars to currently empty bindings?

I'm currently typing this post with my windows XP machine and (Spanish) keyboard, and I'd like to add some extra symbols to my text. I could open the "char map" windows utility, look for the desired symbols, and paste them. But I'd like something quickier. For example, when I'm using my OSX Mac at work, I can easily add a ©, ™, ® or similar symbols, just pressing some weird ALT-GR + G / H / J, key combinations. In my (Spanish) keyboard mapping, these combinations are empty, as they don't produce any char at all, which, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and desirable. So, I thought: Why couldn't I add some extra key mappings on top of my currently empty ALT-GR + G/J/H Keys in my Spanish keyboard, and thus, being able to quickly type these special symbols? So that's my question: Is there any utility/method to achieve that effect under windows? (My version is XP). I've even googled this for some time but no luck. I've been a long term Hot...

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...