Skip to main content

linux - What is the difference between systemd's user and system services?


I'm trying to understand a little better systemd by writing some services.


I have difficulties in understanding the differences between those 2 services for instance, well I'd like to be sure I understand them correctly would be more appropriate.


So for instance I got rtorrent service, defined as rt as a system service, that I can enable for user X,Y,Z, with sudo systemctl enable rt@userX.service


➜  ~  cat /etc/systemd/system/rt@.service
[Unit]
Description=rTorrent
Requires=network.target local-fs.target

[Service]
Type=forking
KillMode=none
User=%I
ExecStart=/usr/bin/tmux new-session -s rt -n rtorrent -d rtorrent
ExecStop=/usr/bin/tmux send-keys -t rt:rtorrent C-q
WorkingDirectory=/home/%I/
Restart=on-failure

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

and I got dropbox defined that way :


➜  ~  cat /etc/systemd/user/dropbox@.service
[Service]
ExecStart=/bin/sh %h/.dropbox-dist/dropboxd
ExecReload=/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

If I understand well, the dropbox service can be started / stopped / enabled / disabled at a user level, for many users, even if that user isn't an admin. Does it mean I can as userX enable it for userY ? As for the rt service, only an admin can enable / start / stop it ... Is that the only difference between a system service and a user one ?



Answer



You're a bit muddled, yes. ☺ You have:



  • A set of system services that are managed by the system-wide instance of systemd; which are each an instatiation of a template service unit in the file /etc/systemd/system/rt@.service.

  • A set of user services that are managed by the per-user instances of systemd; which are each an instantiation of a template service unit in the file /etc/systemd/user/dropbox@.service.


You now need to understand this:



  • There is one system-wide instance of systemd. It always runs. It's process #1. Only an administrator has the authority to control system services.

  • There are multiple per-user instances of systemd. They are started/stopped on demand as users logon/logoff. They are not process #1. There is a maximum of one per user, however many times the user is logged on. Only that user (or an administrator) has the authority to control xyr own services.


A template service unit is a way of making multiple ad-hoc service units on the fly, that differ in the template parameter. The actual instantiated service units are named as a combination of the template name and the parameter.


Combined, this all means:



  • In your rt@.service the parameter is a user name, used to specify the user that the service runs as and the working directory that it runs in. So you can instantiate services such as rt@euri10.service and rt@david.service. These are system services, managed by the system-wide instance of systemd, and it takes an administrator to start and stop them. It just so happens that there's one per user.

  • In your dropbox@.service the parameter is ignored. You can instantiate services such as dropbox@wibble.service and dropbox@phooey.service. These are user services, managed by the per-user instances of systemd. Each user has xyr own separate set of template instantiations which that user can start and stop.


You possibly didn't want your dropbox service unit to be a template. Or you're now figuring out what that Environment=DISPLAY=%i setting was all about. ☺


Comments

Popular Posts

keyboard - Is there any utility/method to change Windows key bindings to type rare chars to currently empty bindings?

I'm currently typing this post with my windows XP machine and (Spanish) keyboard, and I'd like to add some extra symbols to my text. I could open the "char map" windows utility, look for the desired symbols, and paste them. But I'd like something quickier. For example, when I'm using my OSX Mac at work, I can easily add a ©, ™, ® or similar symbols, just pressing some weird ALT-GR + G / H / J, key combinations. In my (Spanish) keyboard mapping, these combinations are empty, as they don't produce any char at all, which, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and desirable. So, I thought: Why couldn't I add some extra key mappings on top of my currently empty ALT-GR + G/J/H Keys in my Spanish keyboard, and thus, being able to quickly type these special symbols? So that's my question: Is there any utility/method to achieve that effect under windows? (My version is XP). I've even googled this for some time but no luck. I've been a long term Hot...

virtualization - How to select paravirtualization interface in VirtualBox?

Given a windows 8 host system (Intel Core i5) and a Linux Fedora host, I would like to determine the optimal setting for the paravirtual interface. Options are none Default Legacy minimal Hyper-V KVM This page suggest the selection is only based on the guest system: The biggest change in VirtualBox 5.0 is the introduction of paravirtualization support, bringing higher performance and time-keeping accuracy to supported guest operating systems (Hyper-V on Windows and KVM on Linux). Is that correct? Answer The VirtualBox Manual , in the section titled Paravirtualization providers explains very clearly when each should be used (emphasis added): Minimal: Announces the presence of a virtualized environment. Additionally, reports the TSC and APIC frequency to the guest operating system. This provider is mandatory for running any Mac OS X guests. KVM: Presents a Linux KVM hypervisor interface which is recognized by Linux kernels starting with version 2.6.25. VirtualBox's implementati...

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...

security - How is Linux not prone to viruses, malware and those kinds of things?

How is Linux protected against viruses? This question was a Super User Question of the Week . Read the blog entry for more details or contribute to the blog yourself Answer Well, it factually is not... it's just less subject to hackers developing viruses that target Linux systems. Consumer grade computers usually run on Windows and thus, when targeting a wide audience, Windows is the way to go. Don't misunderstand Linux and viruses, there definitely ARE Linux viruses. Some distros have additional protection layers such as SELinux (See here ) in Ubuntu for example. Then there's the default firewall and the fact that alien files don't automatically have permission to be executed. Specific execution permission has to be granted before execution is possible. (See here ) Then there are several other factors that make Linux a hard place to be for viruses usually non-root users on linux systems have no to little executable files at their disposal that would allow for virus...