Skip to main content

windows 7 - Is reducing maximum processor usage in Power Options safe?


My PC has:



  • Core 2 Duo

  • 4GB RAM

  • ATI 5450 Radeon graphics

  • Windows 7 64-bit


I want to reduce maximum CPU usage in Power Options in the Control Panel to avoid overheating. Is this safe, or can reducing the maximum CPU usage damage hardware (hard disk, CPU, etc.)?⠀⠀⠀



Answer



The option in question is not under-clocking; Windows does not manipulate the CPU or motherboard or multipliers or FSB or anything. The option you are inquiring about is simply a factor that is used during task-scheduling.


When processes run, the Windows task-scheduler allocates a specific number of CPU cycles to different processes and switches back and forth to enable preemptive multitasking. Normally, it assigns as many CPU cycles as are available in order to run everything as fast as possible. If there are free cycles, it lets the program run, if not, it puts the process in a queue and checks to see if there is another program which has used up its allotment for the current “quantum” (or “time-slice”) and should be moved to the back of the line.


Not surprisingly, running the CPU at 100% capacity for a while will heat it up, and this can be undesirable. What Windows lets you do is to assign a limit to how much CPU capacity is usable.


In this case, when processes request CPU time, the scheduler works exactly as before, except that it uses the limit specified in its calculations instead of 100%. As a result, there will be CPU cycles that remain unused, which allows the CPU to remain at a lower temperature.


As a simplified and contrived example, imagine that this was the pseudo-code for the scheduling algorithm (with comments marked by ;):


; function to calculate total CPU cycles used by all processes
calc-total-used:
used-total = 0 ; initialize counter to 0
for each program: ; loop through each running process
used-total = used-total + process-used ; add CPU cycles of each process to counter
return used-total as percentage ; convert to percent and return value

; main scheduling control, check if free cycles available
if (calc-total-used < max-percent) ; calc used %, see if less than max allowed
then run program ; if so, run the program
else: ; if not, try to free some up
add program to queue ; if not, add it to the queue
… ; check if any process are out of cycles

Notice how the scheduling calculation uses a max-percent variable instead of hard-coding 100%. This way, if you set it lower than 100%, it will only allow a program to run if the current usage is less than 100%, which of course means that any CPU cycles between max-percent above that will not be used.


Therefore, this option cannot harm the CPU; it is no different than simply not running any programs and just idling the system (you have likely already had your system idling near 0% CPU load many times).


Comments

Popular Posts

How do I transmit a single hexadecimal value serial data in PuTTY using an Alt code?

I am trying to sent a specific hexadecimal value across a serial COM port using PuTTY. Specifically, I want to send the hex codes 9C, B6, FC, and 8B. I have looked up the Alt codes for these and they are 156, 182, 252, and 139 respectively. However, whenever I input the Alt codes, a preceding hex value of C2 is sent before 9C, B6, and 8B so the values that are sent are C2 9C, C2 B6, and C2 8B. The value for FC is changed to C3 FC. Why are these values being placed before the hex value and why is FC being changed altogether? To me, it seems like there is a problem internally converting the Alt code to hex. Is there a way to directly input hex values without using Alt codes in PuTTY? Answer What you're seeing is just ordinary text character set conversion. As far as PuTTY is concerned, you are typing (and reading) text , not raw binary data, therefore it has to convert the text to bytes in whatever configured character set before sending it over the wire. In other words, when y...

linux - Extract/save a mail attachment using bash

Using normal bash tools (ie, built-ins or commonly-available command-line tools), is it possible, and how to extract/save attachments on emails? For example, say I have a nightly report which arrives via email but is a zip archive of several log files. I want to save all those zips into a backup directory. How would I accomplish that? Answer If you're aiming for portability, beware that there are several different versions of mail(1) and mailx(1) . There's a POSIX mailx command, but with very few requirements. And none of the implementations I have seem to parse attachments anyway. You might have the mpack package . Its munpack command saves all parts of a MIME message into separate files, then all you have to do is save the interesting parts and clean up the rest. There's also metamail . An equivalent of munpack is metamail -wy .

keyboard - Is there any utility/method to change Windows key bindings to type rare chars to currently empty bindings?

I'm currently typing this post with my windows XP machine and (Spanish) keyboard, and I'd like to add some extra symbols to my text. I could open the "char map" windows utility, look for the desired symbols, and paste them. But I'd like something quickier. For example, when I'm using my OSX Mac at work, I can easily add a ©, ™, ® or similar symbols, just pressing some weird ALT-GR + G / H / J, key combinations. In my (Spanish) keyboard mapping, these combinations are empty, as they don't produce any char at all, which, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and desirable. So, I thought: Why couldn't I add some extra key mappings on top of my currently empty ALT-GR + G/J/H Keys in my Spanish keyboard, and thus, being able to quickly type these special symbols? So that's my question: Is there any utility/method to achieve that effect under windows? (My version is XP). I've even googled this for some time but no luck. I've been a long term Hot...

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...