Skip to main content

Why are there chargers available for the same laptop with different wattages?


I have Acer Aspire 7745G and I’m curious why I can find supported chargers with different wattages?


Here are the specs for each charger:




Answer




The chargers most likely have the same connector to the laptop and the manufacturers are offering higher wattage to make their chargers more appealing to a larger market of Acer laptop users.


Without knowing anything about these laptops — and using basic deductive reasoning — let’s just look at which laptop models each of these chargers are for:



  • Laptop Charger Factory: 7745G

  • Green Cell: 7552G 7745G 7750G V3-771G V3-772G

  • KWOKKERK Laptop Charger Store: 7750G 7739Z 7560G 7745G 5750


Without even knowing the wattage, my immediate guess is the Green Cell and KWOKKERK models are higher wattage than the one from Laptop Charger Factory. Why? Easy: Those models provide more wattage. And it’s clear to me that the one from Laptop Charger Factory just supports the 7745G so it must be the lowest wattage.


And none of this is weird… Pretty much every smart phone and related charger nowadays behaves on the same principle.


This is no different than how I can charge and iPhone — or similar device — with a 5W, 10W, 12W, 18W, 30W and higher chargers: The device itself — and perhaps the cable being used — determines how many watts it will take.


Thus if I have a 30W charger and need to charge a device that only uses 5W, I can without fear of anything blowing up or catching on fire. This is a common concept on many devices nowadays.


That said, I would recommend buying the best quality charger you can get for your laptop; lots of cheap knock-offs out there that might not work as expected or won’t last long. That KWOKKERK model that delivers 90W for $8.63 sounds like a “bargain” that you will pay for in some way later on; meaning it seems like cheap garbage.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

keyboard - Is there any utility/method to change Windows key bindings to type rare chars to currently empty bindings?

I'm currently typing this post with my windows XP machine and (Spanish) keyboard, and I'd like to add some extra symbols to my text. I could open the "char map" windows utility, look for the desired symbols, and paste them. But I'd like something quickier. For example, when I'm using my OSX Mac at work, I can easily add a ©, ™, ® or similar symbols, just pressing some weird ALT-GR + G / H / J, key combinations. In my (Spanish) keyboard mapping, these combinations are empty, as they don't produce any char at all, which, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and desirable. So, I thought: Why couldn't I add some extra key mappings on top of my currently empty ALT-GR + G/J/H Keys in my Spanish keyboard, and thus, being able to quickly type these special symbols? So that's my question: Is there any utility/method to achieve that effect under windows? (My version is XP). I've even googled this for some time but no luck. I've been a long term Hot...
Post a Comment
Read more

virtualization - How to select paravirtualization interface in VirtualBox?

Given a windows 8 host system (Intel Core i5) and a Linux Fedora host, I would like to determine the optimal setting for the paravirtual interface. Options are none Default Legacy minimal Hyper-V KVM This page suggest the selection is only based on the guest system: The biggest change in VirtualBox 5.0 is the introduction of paravirtualization support, bringing higher performance and time-keeping accuracy to supported guest operating systems (Hyper-V on Windows and KVM on Linux). Is that correct? Answer The VirtualBox Manual , in the section titled Paravirtualization providers explains very clearly when each should be used (emphasis added): Minimal: Announces the presence of a virtualized environment. Additionally, reports the TSC and APIC frequency to the guest operating system. This provider is mandatory for running any Mac OS X guests. KVM: Presents a Linux KVM hypervisor interface which is recognized by Linux kernels starting with version 2.6.25. VirtualBox's implementati...
Post a Comment
Read more

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...
Post a Comment
Read more

security - How is Linux not prone to viruses, malware and those kinds of things?

How is Linux protected against viruses? This question was a Super User Question of the Week . Read the blog entry for more details or contribute to the blog yourself Answer Well, it factually is not... it's just less subject to hackers developing viruses that target Linux systems. Consumer grade computers usually run on Windows and thus, when targeting a wide audience, Windows is the way to go. Don't misunderstand Linux and viruses, there definitely ARE Linux viruses. Some distros have additional protection layers such as SELinux (See here ) in Ubuntu for example. Then there's the default firewall and the fact that alien files don't automatically have permission to be executed. Specific execution permission has to be granted before execution is possible. (See here ) Then there are several other factors that make Linux a hard place to be for viruses usually non-root users on linux systems have no to little executable files at their disposal that would allow for virus...
Post a Comment
Read more