Skip to main content

bootloader - primary and secondary boot loaders


From http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-bootload/index.html



Boot loaders are usually configured in one of two ways: either as a primary boot loader or as a secondary boot loader.


Primary boot loaders are where the first stage of the boot loader is installed on the MBR (per the previous description).


Secondary boot loaders are where the first stage of the boot loader is installed onto a bootable partition.


A separate boot loader must then be installed into the MBR and configured to pass control to the secondary boot loader.



Should "first" in "Secondary boot loaders are where the first stage of the boot loader is installed onto a bootable partition" be "second" instead?


Where is the secondary boot loader stored? Not in MBR where the primary boot loader is stored?


What is "a separate boot loader" in the last sentence? Is it the primary or secondary boot loader?


is the primary boot loader the same concept as the initial program loader (IPL, mentioned in the same link)?



Due to the very small amount of data the BIOS can access, most boot loaders load in two stages. In the first stage of the boot, the BIOS loads a part of the boot loader known as the initial program loader, or IPL. The IPL interrogates the partition table and subsequently is able to load data wherever it may exist on the various media. This action is used initially to locate the second stage boot loader, which holds the remainder of the loader. The second stage boot loader is the real meat of the boot loader; many consider it the only real part of the boot loader. This contains the more disk-intensive parts of the loader, such as user interfaces and kernel loaders. These user interfaces can range from a simple command line to the all-singing, all-dancing GUIs.



Thanks!



Answer



There is an ambiguity in that text actually. Primary boot loader doesn't mean the first stage of a boot loader, and secondary boot loader doesn't mean the second stage of a boot loader.


First stage of a boot loader is the program resides in MBR data which holds partition information and capability to handle very basic disk I/O operations those cannot accomplish to fully load the O.S since MBR boot loader code size is limited to 448-bytes for standart MBR records (lower for spesific O.S implementations, since partition table holds 4*16-Bytes)


First stage of the boot loader's job is to simply load the second stage which now nows the O.S spesifics and it has much more code space. As far as I remember, NTFS second boot loader has 16 512-bytes sectors to load O.S kernel, 8-KBytes.


Primary and secondary terms come in where there are multiple O.S.es to choose to boot. Each O.S has its boot loader that has first and second stages, each boot loader should start from stage one since the primary boot laoder in MBR shouldn't be expected to know about spesifics of the second stages in every boot loader.


Second stages are stored on the beginning of the partition itself which is called VBR, Volume Boot Record.


When there is one O.S to boot, MBR program (IPL) is the first stage and VBR program is the second stage. When there are multiple O.Ss, MBR program becomes the first stage of the primary boot loader, that stage know there are some code in some partition which is second stage to fully load the whole menu and options, and loads it. That second stage knows about the partitions which has VBR, and continues with VBR, now VBR became secondary boot loader.


Yes, I said "each boot loader should start from stage one since the primary boot laoder in MBR shouldn't be expected to know about spesifics of the second stages in every boot loader.". It is why VBR code also has MBR code in itself, too. Windows VBR codes have it.


Comments

Popular Posts

Use Google instead of Bing with Windows 10 search

I want to use Google Chrome and Google search instead of Bing when I search in Windows 10. Google Chrome is launched when I click on web, but it's Bing search. (My default search engine on Google and Edge is http://www.google.com ) I haven't found how to configure that. Someone can help me ? Answer There is no way to change the default in Cortana itself but you can redirect it in Chrome. You said that it opens the results in the Chrome browser but it used Bing search right? There's a Chrome extension now that will redirect Bing to Google, DuckDuckGo, or Yahoo , whichever you prefer. More information on that in the second link.

linux - Using an index to make grep faster?

I find myself grepping the same codebase over and over. While it works great, each command takes about 10 seconds, so I am thinking about ways to make it faster. So can grep use some sort of index? I understand an index probably won't help for complicated regexps, but I use mostly very simple patters. Does an indexer exist for this case? EDIT: I know about ctags and the like, but I would like to do full-text search. Answer what about cscope , does this match your shoes? Allows searching code for: all references to a symbol global definitions functions called by a function functions calling a function text string regular expression pattern a file files including a file

How do I transmit a single hexadecimal value serial data in PuTTY using an Alt code?

I am trying to sent a specific hexadecimal value across a serial COM port using PuTTY. Specifically, I want to send the hex codes 9C, B6, FC, and 8B. I have looked up the Alt codes for these and they are 156, 182, 252, and 139 respectively. However, whenever I input the Alt codes, a preceding hex value of C2 is sent before 9C, B6, and 8B so the values that are sent are C2 9C, C2 B6, and C2 8B. The value for FC is changed to C3 FC. Why are these values being placed before the hex value and why is FC being changed altogether? To me, it seems like there is a problem internally converting the Alt code to hex. Is there a way to directly input hex values without using Alt codes in PuTTY? Answer What you're seeing is just ordinary text character set conversion. As far as PuTTY is concerned, you are typing (and reading) text , not raw binary data, therefore it has to convert the text to bytes in whatever configured character set before sending it over the wire. In other words, when y

networking - Windows 10, can ping other PC but cannot access shared folders! What gives?

I have a computer running Windows 7 that shares a Git repo on drive D. Let's call this PC " win7 ". This repo is the origin of a project that we push to and pull from. The network is a wireless network. One PC on this network is running on Windows 10. Let's call this PC " win10 ". Win10 can ping every other PC on the network including win7 . Win7 can ping win10 . Win7 can access all shared files on win10 . Neither of the PCs have passwords. Problem : Win10 cannot access any shared files on win7 , not from Explorer, nor from Git Bash or any other Git management system (E-Git on Eclipse or Visual Studio). So, win10 cannot pull/push. Every other PC on the network can access win7 shared files and push/pull to/from the shared Git origin. What's wrong with Windows 10? I have tried these: Control Panel\All Control Panel Items\Network and Sharing Center\Advanced sharing settings\ File sharing is on, Discovery is on, Password protected sharing is off Adapte