Skip to main content

networking - Some confusion about listening and open ports, difference between listening, open and blocked


I have been strugling for some time now to open ports on some Linux machines and I have followed some tutorials, which I tried in 2 different Linux VMs and failed for either, and after some research I think I have found out why this is failing.


So, what did was to download gufw, set a rule to allow inbound connections to a specific port or disabled the firewall and rebooted. After that, when I scanned with zenmap I could see that the port was still closed.


But when I used nc -l -p port I could see that the port was open. The same thing happened on port 80 when the apache server was running for that machine.


Then, I configured the firewall to deny all inbound traffic and rebooted. I started the apache service and ran nc -l -p port and then scanned with zenmap and it said port 80 and the port chosen by nc were filtered


From this I draw the following conclusions:



  • Listening means that the port isn't protected by a firewall or the firewall allows inbound traffic to there and that there is a service listening on that port

  • Filtered means that there may be or may not be a service listening to that port but the firewall is denying inbound traffic

  • Closed means that the port isn't protected by the firewall and but there is no service/application listening on that port


So, opening a port means making it available to the outside if an application is listening. If it isn't, it will show as "closed" on nmap scans.


To sum up, if I want an application to be accessible to the outside, I have to bind it (is that the word?) to a port and then open that port on the firewall.


Is this correct? If you could add something to this I would appreciate it, I asked another question similar to this one but at the time I didn't know much about ports and firewalls, so if my conclusions are correct I can answer that question and hopefuly that will be helpful to someone.


Also, is it still possible to connect to a port in some way even if it isn't listening?



Answer



A port is just a concept for a connection between an application and a layer-4 protocol. There really isn't a "port" as such. When an application wants to receive traffic from a layer-4 protocol (TCP, UDP, etc.), it requests that the protocol send any layer-4 segments for that protocol which are addressed with a particular port number to the application.


When a layer-4 protocol has no application which has requested that layer-4 segments addressed to a particular port number, the port is Closed.


When an application has requested and been granted the use of a port number by a layer-4 protocol, the port is Open.


Firewalls can be set to drop layer-3 packets containing layer-4 segments for a particular layer-4 protocol addressed to a particular port. This means that the port is Filtered or Blocked on the firewall.


Each layer-4 protocol has its own ports, or it many not even use ports. For instance, one application can be receiving traffic for TCP 12345, and another application can be receiving traffic for UDP port 12345; they are not the same port because ports don't actually exist. The use of a particular port number on a particular layer-4 protocol is exclusive to the application granted use of the port by the layer-4 protocol.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Use Google instead of Bing with Windows 10 search

I want to use Google Chrome and Google search instead of Bing when I search in Windows 10. Google Chrome is launched when I click on web, but it's Bing search. (My default search engine on Google and Edge is http://www.google.com ) I haven't found how to configure that. Someone can help me ? Answer There is no way to change the default in Cortana itself but you can redirect it in Chrome. You said that it opens the results in the Chrome browser but it used Bing search right? There's a Chrome extension now that will redirect Bing to Google, DuckDuckGo, or Yahoo , whichever you prefer. More information on that in the second link.
Post a Comment
Read more

linux - Using an index to make grep faster?

I find myself grepping the same codebase over and over. While it works great, each command takes about 10 seconds, so I am thinking about ways to make it faster. So can grep use some sort of index? I understand an index probably won't help for complicated regexps, but I use mostly very simple patters. Does an indexer exist for this case? EDIT: I know about ctags and the like, but I would like to do full-text search. Answer what about cscope , does this match your shoes? Allows searching code for: all references to a symbol global definitions functions called by a function functions calling a function text string regular expression pattern a file files including a file
Post a Comment
Read more

How do I transmit a single hexadecimal value serial data in PuTTY using an Alt code?

I am trying to sent a specific hexadecimal value across a serial COM port using PuTTY. Specifically, I want to send the hex codes 9C, B6, FC, and 8B. I have looked up the Alt codes for these and they are 156, 182, 252, and 139 respectively. However, whenever I input the Alt codes, a preceding hex value of C2 is sent before 9C, B6, and 8B so the values that are sent are C2 9C, C2 B6, and C2 8B. The value for FC is changed to C3 FC. Why are these values being placed before the hex value and why is FC being changed altogether? To me, it seems like there is a problem internally converting the Alt code to hex. Is there a way to directly input hex values without using Alt codes in PuTTY? Answer What you're seeing is just ordinary text character set conversion. As far as PuTTY is concerned, you are typing (and reading) text , not raw binary data, therefore it has to convert the text to bytes in whatever configured character set before sending it over the wire. In other words, when y...
Post a Comment
Read more

linux - CentOs 7.1 - Install Tomcat 8

I am using this tutorial as a setup reference to getting a Tomcat 8 running on CentOs 7.1 , but after typing: [root@localhost tomcat]# sudo systemctl start tomcat I get the error: Job for tomcat.service failed. See 'systemctl status tomcat.service' and 'journalctl -xn' for details. systemctl status tomcat.service prints the following: [root@localhost tomcat]# systemctl status tomcat.service tomcat.service - Apache Tomcat Web Application Container Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/tomcat.service; disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2015-11-25 16:54:33 CET; 1min 19s ago Process: 45873 ExecStart=/opt/tomcat/bin/startup.sh (code=exited, status=203/EXEC) Nov 25 16:54:33 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: Starting Apache Tomcat Web Application Container... Nov 25 16:54:33 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: tomcat.service: control process exited, code=exited status=203 Nov 25 16:54:33 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: Failed to start Apache Tomcat Web App...
Post a Comment
Read more