Skip to main content

windows 10 - Path reset to old value after shutdown


I use a command line tools under windows 10. The path to the tool is set in the system PATH variable so that it can be started from the command line.


Whenever a new version of the tool comes out, I store it to a new directory and update the system PATH to point to the new location. Restart the command window and everything is fine, the new version of the tool is used.


After a ahutdown and start however, the PATH reverts back to the old value and the old version of the tool gets used. Opening the envoronment variable editor and clicking OK, without making any changes, solves the problem ... until the next shutdown. I have searched the whole registry, the old PATH value is nowhere found. It must be stored somewhere else.


After some time, (I guess after a windows update gets installed, but I am not sure about this) the problem goes away and the new PATH value is remembered.


In previous windows versions this worked without problems, I see this behaviour only after upgrade to Windows 10.


How can this be fixed? Is there some way to make the effective PATH permanent?



Answer



This sounds a bit like a slight bug in Windows but here's my guess.


I think you need to actually reboot your machine via Windows -> Power -> Reboot after changing the setting and not shut it down first.


When you say



Opening the envoronment variable editor and clicking OK, without making any changes, solves the problem ... until the next reboot.



I suspect you mean until the next time you shutdown and then boot the machine. This distinction is important in Windows 8 and 10 because a shutdown is not the same as it was and a reboot is closer to an actual shutdown now.


Shutdown now closes your user applications, logs you out and then puts the OS core into hibernation. When you restart your machine it un-hibernates the core and then allows you log back in. As the setting has been (at this stage) only applied to the current user profile then you get the default (old) path.


Doing a proper reboot skips the hibernation step and lets the system boot from scratch, loading new settings and programs. This would be why a Windows update fixes your problem as well, because they perform a reboot rather than a shutdown and restart.


There is some information here on how hybrid shutdown works.


I say this seems like a slight bug because you quite rightly expect your change to get pushed down into to hibernated system, but as it is one that is easily fixed (by rebooting) I expect this sort of problem is one that is relatively low priority to fix.


Comments

Popular Posts

keyboard - Is there any utility/method to change Windows key bindings to type rare chars to currently empty bindings?

I'm currently typing this post with my windows XP machine and (Spanish) keyboard, and I'd like to add some extra symbols to my text. I could open the "char map" windows utility, look for the desired symbols, and paste them. But I'd like something quickier. For example, when I'm using my OSX Mac at work, I can easily add a ©, ™, ® or similar symbols, just pressing some weird ALT-GR + G / H / J, key combinations. In my (Spanish) keyboard mapping, these combinations are empty, as they don't produce any char at all, which, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and desirable. So, I thought: Why couldn't I add some extra key mappings on top of my currently empty ALT-GR + G/J/H Keys in my Spanish keyboard, and thus, being able to quickly type these special symbols? So that's my question: Is there any utility/method to achieve that effect under windows? (My version is XP). I've even googled this for some time but no luck. I've been a long term Hot...

virtualization - How to select paravirtualization interface in VirtualBox?

Given a windows 8 host system (Intel Core i5) and a Linux Fedora host, I would like to determine the optimal setting for the paravirtual interface. Options are none Default Legacy minimal Hyper-V KVM This page suggest the selection is only based on the guest system: The biggest change in VirtualBox 5.0 is the introduction of paravirtualization support, bringing higher performance and time-keeping accuracy to supported guest operating systems (Hyper-V on Windows and KVM on Linux). Is that correct? Answer The VirtualBox Manual , in the section titled Paravirtualization providers explains very clearly when each should be used (emphasis added): Minimal: Announces the presence of a virtualized environment. Additionally, reports the TSC and APIC frequency to the guest operating system. This provider is mandatory for running any Mac OS X guests. KVM: Presents a Linux KVM hypervisor interface which is recognized by Linux kernels starting with version 2.6.25. VirtualBox's implementati...

Desktop reboots itself on sleep or hibernate

I have been using an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard for main home desktop workstation, operating Windows Vista x64. This computer has right from day one not been able to enter hibernate or standby; after Windows performs its final actions and brings the machine down, it would automatically revive itself for a reboot. Updating to the second latest BIOS (1201)has not helped (the latest BIOS revision would induce video refresh problems rendering it unusable). I have been reading related discussions on incidents similar to mine to no avail of a true workable solution. They appear to be more speculative guesses rather than actual knowledge on the inner workings of motherboard hardware. Does anybody have any electronic engineering experience on PC energy-saving standards to provide a more informed opinion how to go about getting this to work? More stories: this motherboard could not even reboot properly the first thing i used it. It was due to refresh rate of the onboard GPU, which had no influe...

security - How is Linux not prone to viruses, malware and those kinds of things?

How is Linux protected against viruses? This question was a Super User Question of the Week . Read the blog entry for more details or contribute to the blog yourself Answer Well, it factually is not... it's just less subject to hackers developing viruses that target Linux systems. Consumer grade computers usually run on Windows and thus, when targeting a wide audience, Windows is the way to go. Don't misunderstand Linux and viruses, there definitely ARE Linux viruses. Some distros have additional protection layers such as SELinux (See here ) in Ubuntu for example. Then there's the default firewall and the fact that alien files don't automatically have permission to be executed. Specific execution permission has to be granted before execution is possible. (See here ) Then there are several other factors that make Linux a hard place to be for viruses usually non-root users on linux systems have no to little executable files at their disposal that would allow for virus...